The company formerly known as WeWork, in an amendment to the S-1thatlauncheddozens ofcriticalheadlines, says it has added a new director to its board and unwound the $5.9 million payout to chief executive Adam Neumann over the name We.The new board member is Frances Frei, a professor of technology and operations management at Harvard Business School and a consultant to the company since March 2019.Freis previous claim to fame was rehabilitating the executive and managerial team at Uber Technologies in the wake of a series of fiascos that ultimately brought down the companys chief executive, Travis Kalanick.Frei becomes the first woman on the We Companys board of directors repairing an oversight which the company received criticism for when it first filed for its initial public offering.
Shareholder advocacy groups have pressed for greater diversity on corporate boards as a means to improve company performance and offer a broader range of strategic guidance.As part of the amended filing, The We Company also committed to add a director to the board that will increase the companys gender and ethnic diversity.In the same amendment, the company said that it was unwinding the $5.9 million transaction between itself and a holding company WE Holdings LLC, which held the trademark for the We brand and was owned by We Companys chief executive, Adam Neumann.[At] Adams direction, the issuance to WE Holdings LLC of the partnership interests was unwound and the partnership interests were returned to the We Company Partnership, the company said in a statement.To clarify: The chief executive officer of a company agreed to unwind an agreement with himself that paid him nearly $6 million so that the company he ran could use the trademark We.
It also added a new independent director to its board who had been a paid consultant of the company for months before joining the board of directors.All of this comes after the same chief executive cashed out of $700 million through company stock and loan agreements.No wonder people are calling the company a corporate governance nightmare.